Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory2 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 03:45
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E6300-$66
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 39.5
2-Core 78.5
42% 63.1 Pts
4-Core 78
8-Core 76.5
10% 77.2 Pts
64-Core 77.3
5% 77.3 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 3048)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.54
Parallax 0.59
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.83
0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
457GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 235 235 237 242 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.2% Good
Read 223
Write 238
Mixed 211
SusWrite 236
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 27.9
96% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 110
94% 140 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback