PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 8.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3396 |
Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150318 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 28 '19 at 18:54 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | PAK-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
|
72.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
8.11%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk SD9SB8W-256G-1006 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6103006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 193 190 190 195 196 MB/s
|
62.2%
Good
|
|||
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$32
882GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 147 146 148 148 148 MB/s
|
83.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
49.5%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,075x |
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 995x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 412x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 384x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 347x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 215x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $322 |