| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Acer Aspire X3950 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Acer Aspire X3950 |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100505 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 23 '19 at 09:31 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51.7%
Above average
|
60% 104 Pts
|
27% 205 Pts
|
13% 208 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 315
Sapphire(174B 1141) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
2.18%
Terrible
|
2% 2.64 fps
|
2% 2.58 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 16 99 85 20 41 MB/s
|
37.1%
Below average
|
23% 105 MB/s
|
72% 26.8 MB/s
|
46% 98.4 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT125U7BFR8C-H9 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.3%
Below average
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
21% 7.3 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Aspire X3950 Builds (Compare 149 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Acer Aspire X3950
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 60x |
| Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples | 30x |
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 24x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 46x |
| GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples | 18x |
| GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $60 |