Today's hottest deals

Asus G20CB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G20CB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20CB
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '19 at 09:32
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 251
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 703
69% 564 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 8725) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.1% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 137
Parallax 120
99% 126 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 122
Splatting 102
90% 111 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U512G1002 512GB
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 245 249 239 251 238 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 452
Write 421
Mixed 272
SusWrite 254
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 34.2
106% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.5
DQ Write 68.4
DQ Mixed 39.7
33% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
704GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 193 194 192 196 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 173
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 194
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 111%
Great: 107%
ADATA HD650 1TB
29GB free, PID a35a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 58 0.4 0.3 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 83.5
Write 84.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 38.2
83% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 47%
M4-CT128 M4SSD2 128GB
22GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 67 70 69 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 23.5
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 68.7
108% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 12.4
2,042% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 47.3
DQ Mixed 11.4
2,068% 26 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 191%
Great: 197%
ST500LM0 00-1EJ162 500GB
38GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 66 68 68 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 85.7
Write 54.7
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 67.5
89% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 54%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB
2GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 72.3
Write 70
Mixed 32
71% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 43%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
22GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.2 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 65.7
Write 46
Mixed 24
SusWrite 1
39% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G20CB Builds (Compare 1,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Asus G20CB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback