Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion KJ378AA-ABA a6430f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion KJ378AA-ABA a6430f  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek NARRA3
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '19 at 23:44
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 8400 Triple-Core
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 30.2
2-Core 48.2
18% 39.2 Pts
4-Core 57
8-Core 54.6
8% 55.8 Pts
64-Core 55.1
3% 55.1 Pts
Poor: 7% Great: 22%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.10.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.2% Below average
Lighting 31.1
Reflection 34
Parallax 76.2
25% 47.1 fps
MRender 69.5
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 56.7
51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 33 20 21 48 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 75
Write 69.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 37
41% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A 320GB
286GB free
Firmware: PB3O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 69 71 72 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 72.2
Write 66
Mixed 38
SusWrite 69.6
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 41%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
232GB free
Firmware: 3.CH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 35 51 68 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 39
Write 40.2
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 50.8
29% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.63 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 585
7% 585 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback