Today's hottest deals

HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP xw8600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory28.8 GB free of 32.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '19 at 15:41
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5450
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 43.3
2-Core 86.3
41% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 343
30% 256 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2848) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 32
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 37.2
26% 32.9 fps
MRender 40.7
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 33
30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300 256GB-$99
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X351
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 137 75 31 29 20 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.4% Above average
Read 247
Write 171
Mixed 119
SusWrite 59.9
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 29.6
99% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 95.6
88% 137 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 97%
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
75GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 173 174 175 175 175 MB/s
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.3% Above average
Read 260
Write 178
Mixed 189
SusWrite 167
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 14.8
82% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 29.4
61% 124 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3000NM0023 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MS03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 149
Write 42.6
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 42.5
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 65GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
20.7% Poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.2
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 120
34% 120 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $204
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback