PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
Memory | 60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130815 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 10 '19 at 11:53 |
Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
Run User | LCA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
57.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.69
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 311 302 289 303 303 MB/s
|
61.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 126 124 130 126 127 MB/s
|
78.2%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 126 124 130 126 127 MB/s
|
81.8%
Excellent
|
|||
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.9 3.7 MB/s
|
5.82%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 157x |
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 155x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 135x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 178x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 116x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 98x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |