Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '19 at 12:41
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 452
62% 459 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.6% Good
Lighting 76.7
Reflection 78.1
Parallax 73.1
62% 76 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 74
60% 72.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 71 77 82 81 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 91.4
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 75.9
67% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 76%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.4 2.9 3 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 0.2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 3
5% 5.47 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 9%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free, PID a83a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 25 25 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 144
Write 34.1
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 26.1
65% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.8
136% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 25.9
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback