Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 08 '19 at 21:34
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 621
65% 522 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1475 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.6% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 59.3
52% 62.6 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 51.6
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 919 482 477 478 476 466 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
0GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 499
Write 492
Mixed 411
104% 467 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 58.3
199% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 238
199% 291 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
446GB free
Firmware: 0002LIM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 144 144 144 146 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 77%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
17GB free, PID 5583
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 21 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 84.5
Write 31
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 19.5
50% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.7
157% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 31.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 14.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 86%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback