Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80A9
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '19 at 01:49
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 165
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 329
41% 315 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 80A9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4542
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.08% Terrible
Lighting 5.33
Reflection 16
Parallax 5.03
4% 8.78 fps
MRender 7.05
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 11.2
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2120G 120GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 131 141 154 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 475
Write 186
Mixed 221
SusWrite 139
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 30.1
114% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 128
128% 209 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
779GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 123 125 124 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 83
Write 98.7
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 121
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
179% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Notebook Builds (Compare 719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback