Today's hottest deals

Emachines ET1331G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemEmachines ET1331G  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines MCP61PM-GM
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091210
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 03 '19 at 21:16
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250u
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 47.4
32% 45.3 Pts
4-Core 47.3
8-Core 46.7
6% 47 Pts
64-Core 47.8
3% 47.8 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
Acer(1025 0181) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 62 52 62 46 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 80.3
Write 83
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 56.2
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 60%
ST932042 3AS 320GB
89GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 18
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 18.1
24% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston Kingston 8GB
400, 400, 400, 400 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 7.7
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.2
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET1331G Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1331G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback