Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu ESPRIMO P400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P400  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2990-A1
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '19 at 20:33
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$142
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 80.6
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 122
57% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 223
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.02 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 62 175 187 193 194 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32% Below average
Read 177
Write 88
Mixed 88
SusWrite 142
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 12.2
42% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 82.7
DQ Write 60.8
DQ Mixed 77
56% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 32%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
931GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 122 120 120 121 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 119
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Transcend TS512MLK64V3N 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.3% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P400 Builds (Compare 636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback