Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M LX  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '16 at 16:17
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 183
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 361
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.6% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 37.1
Parallax 47.4
32% 41.1 fps
MRender 48
Gravity 35
Splatting 34.3
31% 39.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT128V4SSD2 128GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5FAMM25 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 212
Write 189
Mixed 177
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 4.57
44% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 36.1
DQ Mixed 4.7
10% 18.7 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
28GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 91
Write 82.1
Mixed 57.6
57% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.3
75% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M LX Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback