Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z97 Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Killer  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150512
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateSep 03 '16 at 15:13
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$54
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 95.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 227
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 437
58% 437 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7254
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38% Below average
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 44
Parallax 40.9
38% 43.8 fps
MRender 60.8
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 41
38% 47.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 38%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssd2sc12 0G1SA754D117-820 120GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N111 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 506
Write 154
Mixed 238
65% 299 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 31.7
145% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 54.5
76% 142 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 82%
WD WD6400AADS-00M2B0 640GB
518GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 98.2
Mixed 96.6
74% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.32
95% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
264GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 166
Write 142
Mixed 143
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.32
113% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 21.6
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Killer Builds (Compare 1,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Killer - $707

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback