Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20C5A0N4AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20C5A0N4AD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20C5A0N4AD
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150729
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateAug 16 '16 at 15:40
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4712MQ
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 88
2-Core 173
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 468
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5040) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 6.04
Parallax 5.97
3% 5.18 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.17
4% 5.36 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$39
517GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 53.1
Write 54.4
Mixed 51.6
40% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.07
4K Write 0.57
4K Mixed 0.13
28% 0.26 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 62%
Lexar SD USB_3_0 Read 16GB
11GB free, PID b049
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.03% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 13.2
Mixed 11.7
18% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
19% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback