Today's hottest deals

MSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A21
MotherboardMSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '16 at 02:04
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$105
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 134
2-Core 251
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 521
60% 469 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 367D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.3% Poor
Lighting 0.13
Reflection 84.5
Parallax 74.4
0% 53 fps
MRender 77.6
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 67.5
59% 73.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$150
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 2,035
Write 907
Mixed 1,142
299% 1,361 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 31.5
198% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 48.9
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 31.8
52% 95.3 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 200%
Great: 243%
Plextor M5S 128GB-$75
58GB free
Firmware: 1.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78% Very good
Read 503
Write 211
Mixed 290
73% 335 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 32.5
130% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 35.3
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 70.1
70% 106 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
134GB free
Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 117
Write 134
Mixed 94.4
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.27
86% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
46GB free
Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 126
Write 133
Mixed 120
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.35
86% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 114%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
453GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 89.4
Write 105
Mixed 76.5
117% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.22
81% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 44%
ST910082 2A 100GB
66GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 22.3
Write 28.3
Mixed 23.7
33% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.63
4K Mixed 0.23
31% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 14%
ST350083 0AS 500GB
30GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 41.5
Write 39.7
Mixed 15.5
39% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.41
62% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3500 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 56.1
MC Mixed 40.9
126% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 21
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21) Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A21)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $342
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback