Today's hottest deals

Asus GL702ZC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL702ZC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702ZC
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '19 at 19:31
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 196
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 782
69% 587 Pts
64-Core 1,074
66% 1,074 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX580
Asus(1043 1A60) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1077 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 55.4
32% 50.5 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 47.3
39% 48.5 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
475GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 452 451 452 448 447 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 444
Mixed 436
SusWrite 452
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 49.5
162% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 296
221% 293 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Toshiba MQ03ABB300 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: JP050U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 120 123 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 100
Write 110
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 121
69% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 71%
Generic Flash Disk 64GB
33GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.6 7.5 5.7 7.5 7.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Read 20.4
Write 2.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 7
8% 7.83 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 27.7
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 26
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702ZC Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL702ZC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback