Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC7i5BNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel NUC7i5BNH
MotherboardIntel NUC7i5BNB  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '19 at 11:56
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 159
70% 115 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 281
39% 289 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4877
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 10.8
10% 11 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 16.1
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 511 268 264 262 260 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,209
Write 1,120
Mixed 495
SusWrite 304
174% 782 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 49.1
203% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,020
DQ Write 867
DQ Mixed 589
538% 825 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 170%
Great: 236%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
414GB free
Firmware: JB0O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 93 98 97 96 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 96.3
60% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8213.M16FA 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.8% Good
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 44.7
MC Mixed 12.3
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7i5BNB Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7i5BNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback