Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '19 at 02:20
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 254
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 657
70% 558 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1463 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 18.9
Parallax 22
21% 22.2 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 18.8
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 233 187 204 255 230 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 479
Mixed 371
SusWrite 242
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.4
191% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 236
211% 319 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 110%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/8GX 0420 F3-2400C11-8GXM KHX2400C11D3/8GX 0420 F3-2400C11-8GXM 32GB
2400, 1600, 2400, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.6% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $633
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback