Today's hottest deals

Asus Z8P(N)E-D12(X)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Z8P(N)E-D12(X)  (all builds)
Memory43.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '19 at 14:33
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5507
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 57.2
2-Core 113
52% 83 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 455
40% 342 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 842E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Lighting 39.8
Reflection 37.2
Parallax 53.4
32% 43.5 fps
MRender 50.4
Gravity 44.7
Splatting 34.8
34% 43.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x8GB
6 of 12 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.2% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 13.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z8P(N)E-D12(X) Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus Z8P(N)E-D12(X)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback