Today's hottest deals

Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory38.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160707
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '19 at 16:56
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 176
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 664
59% 501 Pts
64-Core 1871
116% 1871 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 18.4
13% 16.1 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 16.8
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
524GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 413 406 361 392 393 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 433
Mixed 362
SusWrite 390
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 34.2
125% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 261
202% 275 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 41
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 32.6
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 6.2
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback