Today's hottest deals

HP 20-f394

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 20-f394  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AFD
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '19 at 17:05
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 55.7
1-Core 23.3
2-Core 45.6
29% 41.5 Pts
4-Core 88.2
8-Core 90.2
12% 89.2 Pts
64-Core 90.3
6% 90.3 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
HP(103C 2AFD) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 2.22
1% 2.56 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3.09
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 655 480GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 272 316 319 251 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 281
Write 323
Mixed 278
SusWrite 279
66% 290 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 12.4
28% 9.37 MB/s
DQ Read 79.9
DQ Write 35.7
DQ Mixed 57.8
43% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 1.8
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20-f394 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 20-f394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback