Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '19 at 08:50
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$153
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 115
54% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 321
34% 269 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.9% Very good
Lighting 96.2
Reflection 104
Parallax 91.4
78% 97.1 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 97.2
Splatting 99.7
80% 97.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 1TB
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 17 16 28 25 27 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 285
Write 114
Mixed 92
SusWrite 25.9
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 8.1
34% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 45.7
DQ Mixed 76.2
59% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 89%
LSI Logical Volume 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 178 177 176 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 175
Mixed 98.5
SusWrite 177
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
SABRENT 2TB
872GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 31
Write 29.7
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 29.4
22% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-026.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.6% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback