Today's hottest deals

Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '19 at 20:44
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B800
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 76.3
39% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 61.7
8-Core 74.5
9% 68.1 Pts
64-Core 73.3
4% 73.3 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C606) 789MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.88
1% 1.06 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.38 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM000 HM321HI 320GB
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 66 48 44 47 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 85.7
Write 77.4
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 51.5
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 50%
Adata HV300 1TB
691GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 18.3
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 18.6
16% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
61% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 6.9
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA Builds (Compare 592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback