Today's hottest deals

HP p7-1148p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p7-1148p  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACD
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110811
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateJul 27 '16 at 02:24
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3600 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 27.4
2-Core 49.5
31% 44.9 Pts
4-Core 96.5
8-Core 100
13% 98.5 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D Graphics
HP(103C 2ACD) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.892.1.1000
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.16% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 2.03
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 4.13
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.16%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 89.4
Write 71.4
Mixed 74.1
59% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.12
58% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.8% Poor
MC Read 13
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.7
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1148p Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1148p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback