PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Medionpc MS-7681 (all builds) |
Motherboard | MEDIONPC MS-7681 |
Memory | 6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110815 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jan 23 '19 at 22:12 |
Run Duration | 399 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 57% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
71.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$91
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 40 41 64 44 60 MB/s
|
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
27GB free
Firmware: 4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 105 109 105 100 101 MB/s
|
35.6%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$110
339GB free
Firmware: AR13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 78 81 84 86 85 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$110
575GB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 82 84 90 89 93 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$110
3.5TB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 139 144 150 153 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$200
598GB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 119 123 124 124 MB/s
|
||||
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 104 107 109 110 MB/s
|
64%
Good
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
663GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 19 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
|||
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.9 9.1 9 9.1 8.4 MB/s
|
4.7%
Terrible
|
|||
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
772GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4 3.9 4 4 4 MB/s
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
314GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4 4 4 3.9 4 MB/s
|
10.2%
Very poor
|
|||
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
44GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4 4 3.9 4 4.1 MB/s
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
435GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4 3.9 4 4 4.1 MB/s
|
10.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 14x |
Core i7-2600Intel $139Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 4x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 5x |
R9 380AMD $200Bench 33%, 83,027 samples | 3x |
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples | 3x |
SSD | |
---|---|
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples | 4x |
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $215Bench 102%, 68,849 samples | 3x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Average | Total price: $499 |