Today's hottest deals

Notebook N95_KP6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook N95_KP6  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N95_KP6
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170921
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '19 at 20:58
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 218
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 624
64% 519 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Clevo(1558 851B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 32
Parallax 6.09
5% 14.9 fps
MRender 6.43
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 14
8% 8.84 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$75
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,382
Write 987
Mixed 374
201% 915 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 99.7
4K Mixed 43.7
167% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 905
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 702
543% 748 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
485GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 81 83 82 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 48.2
Write 81.7
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 82.3
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
172% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate BUP BL 5TB
1.5TB free, PID ab30
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 43 38 35 36 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 61.7
Mixed 39
SusWrite 40.8
62% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
28% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N95_KP6 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Notebook N95_KP6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback