Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	9.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP h8-1031nl (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AB5
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110722
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '19 at 10:02
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$137 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Memory 82.3 1-Core 40.7 2-Core 78.8 46% 67.3 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 241 22% 188 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(1B0A 90A2) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.73 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	9.74% Terrible	Lighting 10.9 Reflection 12.7 Parallax 9.22 9% 10.9 fps	MRender 15.1 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 14.9 11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.74% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$80 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 560GB free (System drive) Firmware: MN6OA5Q0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 39 56 63 83 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 37.7 Write 53.3 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 61.1 38% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 85%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 1,824 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 402GB free Firmware: 1402 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 29 28 28 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 24.3 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 27.7 21% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.6 160% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 486GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 71 70 73 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 58.3 Write 55 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 70.5 39% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 67%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 709GB free, PID 0400 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 146 144 143 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 114 Write 52.1 Mixed 41.8 SusWrite 140 113% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 0.3 289% 3.1 MB/s	DQ Read 0.2 DQ Write 2.5 DQ Mixed 0.4 99% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	44.8% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 9.9 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

HP h8-1031nl

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)