PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 6.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP hp workstation xw8200 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 08B4h |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 14.001 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20051222 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 10 '19 at 10:01 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.40GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
34.4%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.61
|
6.38%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 88 94 104 108 MB/s
|
25.3%
Poor
|
|||
22.1%
Poor
|
||||
WD WD800JB-00JJC0 80GB
23GB free
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 38 39 MB/s
|
21.4%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 47GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz1stBench 31%, 33 samples | 1x |
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz1stBench 31%, 48 samples | 1x |
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.80GHz1stBench 33%, 11 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |