Today's hottest deals

Medion WAM2040

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemMedion WAM2040  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION WAM2040
Memory1.4 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20070319
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 05 '19 at 15:54
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-50
U1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 47.2
31% 43.8 Pts
4-Core 47
8-Core 46.7
6% 46.8 Pts
64-Core 46.5
3% 46.5 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 6150
Wistron(17C0 4075) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 307.68
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.04% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.08
Parallax 0.06
0% 0.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.04%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 4.2 10 15 14 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 35
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 13.1
21% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
2048, 512 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback