Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion AA777BB-AB0 999tw

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHp-pavilion AA777BB-AB0 999tw  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A8Ch
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100118
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 15:09
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 84
44% 67.3 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 160
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320
Nvidia(10DE 0779) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 5.13
Reflection 6.38
Parallax 1.91
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 6.24
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 4.48
4% 4.64 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 44 11 8.2 29 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 68
Write 42.2
Mixed 38
SusWrite 23.9
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OCZ3G1333LV2G OCZ3G1333LV2G 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.5% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback