Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S935

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK S935  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB284
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '18 at 20:50
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 41%
CPU Throttled 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 27.9
2-Core 48.2
38% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 60.6
8-Core 70.7
9% 65.6 Pts
64-Core 69.5
4% 69.5 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 1896) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
2.63% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 3.77
Parallax 3.19
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 2.87
Splatting 5.43
4% 4.21 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.63%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-00000 128GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 152 150 147 154 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 363
Write 143
Mixed 176
SusWrite 151
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 29.4
106% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 149
134% 206 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.7% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 14.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8.8
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK S935 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S935

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback