Today's hottest deals

Acer Extensa 2540

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Extensa 2540  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Gemini_SK
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161109
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateDec 30 '18 at 13:37
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 47.9
1-Core 51.7
2-Core 167
47% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 266
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1085) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Lighting 6.93
Reflection 9.58
Parallax 6.22
6% 7.58 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 0.04
3% 3.96 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSC180DS37256GH 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 55 86 43 59 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 296
Write 114
Mixed 263
SusWrite 99
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 14.1
51% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 13.3
DQ Write 57.2
DQ Mixed 15.4
18% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBGR/8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 2540 Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 2540

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $148
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback