Today's hottest deals

HP ProLiant ML350 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP ProLiant ML350 G5  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '18 at 22:53
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5420
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 54.6
1-Core 36
2-Core 72
34% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 282
25% 213 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 04CF) 1GB
CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 4.53
Reflection 3.23
Parallax 6.16
4% 4.64 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 3.22
3% 3.92 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 1.5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.72
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 168 192 195 199 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 162
Mixed 29
SusWrite 186
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML350 G5 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML350 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback