Today's hottest deals

Asus K53TK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus K53TK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53TK
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120202
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 25 '16 at 19:32
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3420M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 68.8
39% 57.9 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 107
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Asus(1043 2122) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.973.0.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 2.56
3% 3.38 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 4.39
3% 3.68 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
452GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JEDO Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 70.1
Write 41.5
Mixed 53
41% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.18
60% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 SSZ302G08-GDJEC 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.5% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.7
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53TK Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53TK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $24
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback