Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F222BEC8
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111107
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 22 '16 at 21:52
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 32.8
2-Core 48.5
34% 48.4 Pts
4-Core 55.5
8-Core 59.1
8% 57.3 Pts
64-Core 63.1
4% 63.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 320M
Apple(106B 00C2) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.17.12.6141
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.47
Reflection 3.04
Parallax 0.94
2% 2.15 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.87
2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545025B9SA02 250GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB2AC60W Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 59.4
Write 58.8
Mixed 11.1
31% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.26
66% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro7,1 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback