Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory4.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime5 Days
Run DateJun 22 '16 at 08:05
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 120
59% 92 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 208
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Gigabyte(1458 21AC) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.16% Terrible
Lighting 1.53
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 1.34
1% 1.82 fps
MRender 1.33
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.16 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.16%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 86.2
Write 74.2
Mixed 86
62% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.42
99% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 68%
Samsung S2 Portable 750GB
228GB free, PID 1f09
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 20.5
Mixed 23.8
30% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.2
45% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Transcend TS512MLK64V3N HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.2% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback