Today's hottest deals

Panasonic CF-54-3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPanasonic CF-54-3  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF54-3
Memory11.3 GB free of 16.0156 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180110
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateDec 03 '18 at 07:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 75
1-Core 104
2-Core 178
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 294
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4481
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.15% Terrible
Lighting 7.67
Reflection 11
Parallax 7.06
6% 8.59 fps
MRender 8.57
Gravity 6.57
Splatting 15.5
9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.15%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256GCSY 256GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYPA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 92 92 97 87 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 365
Write 147
Mixed 204
SusWrite 94.2
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 13.6
74% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 228
181% 256 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4S26BFSD.16FBR2 859B BLS8G4S26BFSD.16FBR2 64GB
2400, 2400, 0 MHz
8192, 8192, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.8% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 25.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.6
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-54-3 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-54-3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback