Today's hottest deals

Gbt___ GBTUACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGbt___ GBTUACPI  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.9 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090801
Uptime15.7 Days
Run DateNov 30 '18 at 16:28
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$60
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 141
50% 109 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 279
37% 279 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
XFX(1682 3260) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 31
21% 28.2 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 32.8
22% 26.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 36 40 35 32 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 242
Write 41.3
Mixed 73
SusWrite 36.9
21% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 16
70% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 40.9
DQ Mixed 41.7
49% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 73%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$160
1GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 49.5
Write 48.5
Mixed 41.8
35% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 65%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
9GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 74 68 69 71 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 75.8
Write 75
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 72.5
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 76%
WD My Passport 1TB
25GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 25 26 25 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 41.3
Write 38.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 25.8
44% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 45%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
5GB free, PID a212
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 14 17 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 32.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 15.6
36% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
84% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 94%
Typical GBTUACPI Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ GBTUACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback