Today's hottest deals

HP t630 Thin Client

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP t630 Thin Client  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8158
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '18 at 10:17
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 57.5
1-Core 38.8
2-Core 61.6
35% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 93.2
8-Core 93.4
12% 93.3 Pts
64-Core 93.7
6% 93.7 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7E Graphics
HP(103C 8158) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Lighting 3.33
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 4.62
3% 4.36 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 4.39
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
QM2T-128 128GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 133 134 136 133 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.1% Average
Read 416
Write 129
Mixed 144
SusWrite 130
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 7.1
57% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 53
59% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.3% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t630 Thin Client Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP t630 Thin Client

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback