Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '18 at 14:48
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 249
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 706
73% 586 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 75.4
Reflection 75.1
Parallax 64.8
61% 71.8 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 70.5
58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 578 540 498 478 470 454 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1504
Write 628
Mixed 453
SusWrite 503
170% 772 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 62
228% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 1019
DQ Write 711
DQ Mixed 784
607% 838 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 199%
Great: 292%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
383GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 473 470 482 426 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 435
Mixed 426
SusWrite 436
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 59
199% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 359
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 125%
Great: 129%
Intenso External USB-3.0 1TB
887GB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 110 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 109
66% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 27.1
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $674
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback