Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory1.9 GB free of 6.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090825
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 16:17
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$85
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.2% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 75.6
39% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 145
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 8354) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.62
1% 1.08 fps
MRender 2.05
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.58 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$49
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CHH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 53 51 60 63 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 68.2
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 53.9
42% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 42%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
113GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 58 60 61 62 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 75
Write 77.5
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 56.5
48% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 51%
External USB3.0 500GB
205GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 28.2
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 19.2
19% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 640GB
24GB free, PID 0b09
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 16 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 23.5
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 16.2
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 99U5471-001.A00LF ID:83 0B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG ID:80 2C 4JTF12864AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 4JTF12864AZ-1G4D1 42GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.4% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback