Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-GS4 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141002
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '16 at 19:54
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$52
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 17.6
2-Core 27.9
28% 35.6 Pts
4-Core 43.5
8-Core 54.1
6% 48.8 Pts
64-Core 59.5
4% 59.5 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Zotac(19DA 288B) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6822
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.75% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 11.4
9% 11.1 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 12.5
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.75%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
675GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 155
Mixed 147
118% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.15
69% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G16002 PSD38G16002 16GB
1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback