Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '18 at 20:52
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
CPU socket #0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.5% Good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 149
57% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 304
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 322GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 238 248 254 242 241 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 371
Write 232
Mixed 120
SusWrite 242
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 1
16% 5.37 MB/s
DQ Read 45.8
DQ Write 57.5
DQ Mixed 5.7
17% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 83%
Vmware Virtual disk 644GB
121GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 234 248 257 229 242 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 403
Write 216
Mixed 179
SusWrite 240
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 1.5
16% 5.63 MB/s
DQ Read 85.2
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 23.4
37% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 64 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 46.3
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 15.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 103%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback