Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 60073

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemLenovo 60073  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140801
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateDec 26 '14 at 22:52
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3745
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 20.3
2-Core 40.7
14% 30.5 Pts
4-Core 81.1
8-Core 80.4
11% 80.8 Pts
64-Core 81.2
5% 81.2 Pts
Poor: 23% Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3740
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 0.83
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.88
1% 0.92 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MBG4GC 31GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.11
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
Read 162
Write 49.3
Mixed 84.2
22% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 5.68
4K Mixed 4.44
36% 9.46 MB/s
Generic SU64G SD Card 64GB
33GB free
Firmware: 8.0
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Read 11.4
Write 6.56
Mixed 8.31
7% 8.75 MB/s
4K Read 4.41
4K Write 0.71
4K Mixed 1.06
315% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 15%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback