Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '18 at 11:45
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 149
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 376
39% 314 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 6.88
Parallax 8.69
6% 7.7 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.77
Splatting 11
8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$153
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 160 182 178 173 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 370
Write 251
Mixed 260
SusWrite 174
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 32.8
118% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 34.4
87% 183 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 89%
Marshal MAL2500SA-T54 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: AX0U1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 108 108 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 108
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston X300KG-HYA HP16D3LS1KBG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback