Today's hottest deals

Matech AP8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMatech AP8B75-M  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8B75-M
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '18 at 10:26
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PRY-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 155
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 333
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 1.53
2% 1.86 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 3.96
3% 3.08 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PU1000064GBATSSD 64GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS.51.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 30 27 12 16 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 306
Write 103
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 28.2
28% 130 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 8.4
40% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 8.3
DQ Mixed 8.1
9% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
79GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 87 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 86.5
Write 49
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 86.7
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 14
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AP8B75-M Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Matech AP8B75-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $479
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback