Today's hottest deals

HP Z8 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z8 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C7
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '18 at 04:26
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 5120
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 199
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 727
65% 549 Pts
64-Core 1,604
99% 1,604 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
HP(103C 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 19.8
20% 22.2 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 21.2
18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 177 100 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 1,731
Write 168
Mixed 284
SusWrite 116
123% 575 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.3
69% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 259%
ST4000NM0165 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 210 211 211 212 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.3% Poor
Read 210
Write 202
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 210
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 1.2
9% 4.33 MB/s
DQ Read 2.9
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 2
3% 6.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 63%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$220
2TB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 465 464 461 463 461 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 460
Mixed 441
SusWrite 465
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 43.5
147% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
93GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 23 33 37 36 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 127
Write 74.6
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 39.6
94% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.9
189% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G6D1 4x16GB
4 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
127% Outstanding
MC Read 58.1
MC Write 51.9
MC Mixed 44.3
147% 51.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z8 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP Z8 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback