Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 33671S2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 33671S2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 33671S2
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 21 '18 at 22:13
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3227U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 91.2
50% 75.4 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 133
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FE) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 5.58
Parallax 2.66
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 6.7
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725032A7E630 320GB-$89
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GHBZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 53 49 50 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 93.1
Write 95.8
Mixed 31
SusWrite 54.5
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 16GB
14GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
7.45% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 8
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 4.5
9% 7.92 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.45%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback