PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130423 |
Uptime | 1.3 Days |
Run Date | Oct 21 '18 at 19:38 |
Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core-$81
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SV300S37A/120G 120GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20150818
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 65 65 64 65 MB/s
|
26.2%
Poor
|
|||
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$30
391GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 66 65 65 65 MB/s
|
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
41.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 276x |
FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 186x |
FX-8320AMD $153Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 136x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 64x |
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 64x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 49x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $294 |